Re: [PATCH] ceph: skip reading from Rados if pos exceeds i_size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 1:37 AM Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since we have held the Fr capibility it's safe to skip reading from
> Rados if the ki_pos is larger than or euqals to the file size.

I'm not sure this is correct, based on the patch description. If
you're in a mixed mode where there are writers and readers, they can
all have Frw and extend the file size by issuing rados writes up to
the max_size without updating each other. The client needs to have Fs
before it can rely on knowing the file size, so we should check that
before skipping a read, right?
-Greg

>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/file.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> index 6c9e837aa1d3..330e42b3afec 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> @@ -1614,7 +1614,9 @@ static ssize_t ceph_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> -       if ((got & (CEPH_CAP_FILE_CACHE|CEPH_CAP_FILE_LAZYIO)) == 0 ||
> +       if (unlikely(iocb->ki_pos >= i_size_read(inode))) {
> +               ret = 0;
> +       } else if ((got & (CEPH_CAP_FILE_CACHE|CEPH_CAP_FILE_LAZYIO)) == 0 ||
>             (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) ||
>             (fi->flags & CEPH_F_SYNC)) {
>
> --
> 2.36.0.rc1
>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux