Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: fix possible NULL pointer dereference for req->r_session

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 09:44 +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> The request will be inserted into the ci->i_unsafe_dirops before
> assigning the req->r_session, so it's possible that we will hit
> NULL pointer dereference bug here.
> 
> URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/55327
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/caps.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> index 69af17df59be..c70fd747c914 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
> @@ -2333,6 +2333,8 @@ static int unsafe_request_wait(struct inode *inode)
>  			list_for_each_entry(req, &ci->i_unsafe_dirops,
>  					    r_unsafe_dir_item) {
>  				s = req->r_session;
> +				if (!s)
> +					continue;
>  				if (unlikely(s->s_mds >= max_sessions)) {
>  					spin_unlock(&ci->i_unsafe_lock);
>  					for (i = 0; i < max_sessions; i++) {
> @@ -2353,6 +2355,8 @@ static int unsafe_request_wait(struct inode *inode)
>  			list_for_each_entry(req, &ci->i_unsafe_iops,
>  					    r_unsafe_target_item) {
>  				s = req->r_session;
> +				if (!s)
> +					continue;
>  				if (unlikely(s->s_mds >= max_sessions)) {
>  					spin_unlock(&ci->i_unsafe_lock);
>  					for (i = 0; i < max_sessions; i++) {

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux