On Tue, 2022-03-01 at 22:39 +0800, xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We should skip the extra memories which are from the higher version > just likes the libcephfs client does. > > URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/54430 > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c > index 94b4c6508044..608d077f2eeb 100644 > --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c > +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c > @@ -313,6 +313,7 @@ static int parse_reply_info_lease(void **p, void *end, > { > u8 struct_v; > u32 struct_len; > + void *lend; > > if (features == (u64)-1) { > u8 struct_compat; > @@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ static int parse_reply_info_lease(void **p, void *end, > *altname = NULL; > } > > + lend = *p + struct_len; > ceph_decode_need(p, end, struct_len, bad); > *lease = *p; > *p += sizeof(**lease); > @@ -347,6 +349,7 @@ static int parse_reply_info_lease(void **p, void *end, > *altname_len = 0; > } > } > + *p = lend; > return 0; > bad: > return -EIO; Feel free to fold this into the appropriate patch in wip-fscrypt if you like... Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
