Re: [PATCH 5/5] ceph: fix ceph feature bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 12:42 +0800, xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> index 79d5b8ed62bf..b18eded84ede 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> +++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ enum ceph_feature_type {
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_RECLAIM_CLIENT,
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_LAZY_CAP_WANTED,
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_MULTI_RECONNECT,
> +	CEPHFS_FEATURE_NAUTILUS,
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_DELEG_INO,
> +	CEPHFS_FEATURE_OCTOPUS,
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_METRIC_COLLECT,
>  
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_MAX = CEPHFS_FEATURE_METRIC_COLLECT,
> @@ -43,7 +45,9 @@ enum ceph_feature_type {
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_REPLY_ENCODING,		\
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_LAZY_CAP_WANTED,		\
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_MULTI_RECONNECT,		\
> +	CEPHFS_FEATURE_NAUTILUS,		\
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_DELEG_INO,		\
> +	CEPHFS_FEATURE_OCTOPUS,			\
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_METRIC_COLLECT,		\
>  						\
>  	CEPHFS_FEATURE_MAX,			\

Do we need this? I thought we had decided to deprecate the whole concept
of release-based feature flags.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux