Re: [PATCH 03/11] mm: Protect operations adding pages to page cache with invalidate_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
> index 57a618c4a0d6..93bde2741e0e 100644
> --- a/mm/truncate.c
> +++ b/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_inode_pages_range);
>   * @mapping: mapping to truncate
>   * @lstart: offset from which to truncate
>   *
> - * Called under (and serialised by) inode->i_rwsem.
> + * Called under (and serialised by) inode->i_rwsem and inode->i_mapping_rwsem.

mapping->invalidate_lock, surely?  And could we ask lockdep to assert
this for us instead of just a comment?

>   *
>   * Note: When this function returns, there can be a page in the process of
>   * deletion (inside __delete_from_page_cache()) in the specified range.  Thus
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux