On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 12:59 +0800, xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ceph/addr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> index 57c67180ce5c..5b66f17afe0c 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> @@ -1945,7 +1945,7 @@ int ceph_pool_perm_check(struct inode *inode, int need)
> if (ci->i_vino.snap != CEPH_NOSNAP) {
> /*
> * Pool permission check needs to write to the first object.
> - * But for snapshot, head of the first object may have alread
> + * But for snapshot, head of the first object may have already
> * been deleted. Skip check to avoid creating orphan object.
> */
> return 0;
In general, I don't like to merge patches that just change comments
without other substantive changes. I did make an exception in this
patch:
[PATCH 1/2] ceph: fix kerneldoc copypasta over ceph_start_io_direct
...but that was mainly because that was generating a warning at build-
time for me. I'm going to drop this patch for now.
Cheers,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
