Re: [PATCH v3] libceph: add osd op counter metric support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 7:45 AM Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:19 PM <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The logic is the same with osdc/Objecter.cc in ceph in user space.
> >
> > URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48053
> > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > V3:
> > - typo fixing about oring the _WRITE
> >
> >  include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h |  9 ++++++
> >  net/ceph/debugfs.c              | 13 ++++++++
> >  net/ceph/osd_client.c           | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> > index 83fa08a06507..24301513b186 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> > @@ -339,6 +339,13 @@ struct ceph_osd_backoff {
> >         struct ceph_hobject_id *end;
> >  };
> >
> > +struct ceph_osd_metric {
> > +       struct percpu_counter op_ops;
> > +       struct percpu_counter op_rmw;
> > +       struct percpu_counter op_r;
> > +       struct percpu_counter op_w;
> > +};
>
> OK, so only reads and writes are really needed.  Why not expose them
> through the existing metrics framework in fs/ceph?  Wouldn't "fs top"
> want to display them?  Exposing latency information without exposing
> overall counts seems rather weird to me anyway.

`fs top` may want to eventually display this information but the
intention was to have a "perf dump"-like debugfs file that has
information about the number of osd op reads/writes. We need that for
this test:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/qa/tasks/cephfs/test_readahead.py#L20

Pulling the information out through `fs top` is not a direction I'd like to go.

> The fundamental problem is that debugfs output format is not stable.
> The tracker mentions test_readahead -- updating some teuthology test
> cases from time to time is not a big deal, but if a user facing tool
> such as "fs top" starts relying on these, it would be bad.

`fs top` will not rely on debugfs files.

-- 
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux