Re: crimson-osd vs legacy-osd: should the perf difference be already noticeable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: crimson-osd vs legacy-osd: should the perf difference be already noticeable?
From: vitalif@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:58:13 +0300
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <02e2209f66f18217aa45b8f7caf715f6@suse.de>
References: <02e2209f66f18217aa45b8f7caf715f6@suse.de>
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3

I watched some of their crimson osd mettings on youtube and theydiscussed something similar... however I thought they also said thatcrimson-osd eats less CPU cores during that test. Did it eat less CPU inyour test?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: crimson-osd vs legacy-osd: should the perf difference be already noticeable?
  - From: Roman Penyaev

References:
- crimson-osd vs legacy-osd: should the perf difference be already noticeable?
  - From: Roman Penyaev

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ceph: asynchronous unlink support
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH v4] ceph: use 'copy-from2' operation in copy_file_range
Previous by thread: crimson-osd vs legacy-osd: should the perf difference be already noticeable?
Next by thread: Re: crimson-osd vs legacy-osd: should the perf difference be already noticeable?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [CEPH Users] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Information on CEPH] [Linux BTRFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux