[RFC PATCH] ceph: guard against __ceph_remove_cap races

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I believe it's possible that we could end up with racing calls to
__ceph_remove_cap for the same cap. If that happens, the cap->ci
pointer will be zereoed out and we can hit a NULL pointer dereference.

Once we acquire the s_cap_lock, check for the ci pointer being NULL,
and just return without doing anything if it is.

URL: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/43272
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ceph/caps.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

This is the only scenario that made sense to me in light of Ilya's
analysis on the tracker above. I could be off here though -- the locking
around this code is horrifically complex, and I could be missing what
should guard against this scenario.

Thoughts?

diff --git a/fs/ceph/caps.c b/fs/ceph/caps.c
index 9d09bb53c1ab..7e39ee8eff60 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/caps.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/caps.c
@@ -1046,11 +1046,22 @@ static void drop_inode_snap_realm(struct ceph_inode_info *ci)
 void __ceph_remove_cap(struct ceph_cap *cap, bool queue_release)
 {
 	struct ceph_mds_session *session = cap->session;
-	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = cap->ci;
-	struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc =
-		ceph_sb_to_client(ci->vfs_inode.i_sb)->mdsc;
+	struct ceph_inode_info *ci;
+	struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc;
 	int removed = 0;
 
+	spin_lock(&session->s_cap_lock);
+	ci = cap->ci;
+	if (!ci) {
+		/*
+		 * Did we race with a competing __ceph_remove_cap call? If
+		 * ci is zeroed out, then just unlock and don't do anything.
+		 * Assume that it's on its way out anyway.
+		 */
+		spin_unlock(&session->s_cap_lock);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	dout("__ceph_remove_cap %p from %p\n", cap, &ci->vfs_inode);
 
 	/* remove from inode's cap rbtree, and clear auth cap */
@@ -1058,13 +1069,12 @@ void __ceph_remove_cap(struct ceph_cap *cap, bool queue_release)
 	if (ci->i_auth_cap == cap)
 		ci->i_auth_cap = NULL;
 
-	/* remove from session list */
-	spin_lock(&session->s_cap_lock);
 	if (session->s_cap_iterator == cap) {
 		/* not yet, we are iterating over this very cap */
 		dout("__ceph_remove_cap  delaying %p removal from session %p\n",
 		     cap, cap->session);
 	} else {
+		/* remove from session list */
 		list_del_init(&cap->session_caps);
 		session->s_nr_caps--;
 		cap->session = NULL;
@@ -1072,6 +1082,7 @@ void __ceph_remove_cap(struct ceph_cap *cap, bool queue_release)
 	}
 	/* protect backpointer with s_cap_lock: see iterate_session_caps */
 	cap->ci = NULL;
+	mdsc = ceph_sb_to_client(ci->vfs_inode.i_sb)->mdsc;
 
 	/*
 	 * s_cap_reconnect is protected by s_cap_lock. no one changes
-- 
2.23.0




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux