On 08/19/2019 05:45 PM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:43 AM Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:This commit introduce 3 APIs for journal recording: (1) ceph_journaler_allocate_tag() This api allocate a new tag for user to get a unified tag_tid. Then each event appended by this user will be tagged by this tag_tid. (2) ceph_journaler_append() This api allow user to append event to journal objects. (3) ceph_journaler_client_committed() This api will notify journaling that a event is already committed, you can remove it from journal if there is no other client refre to it. Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang<dongsheng.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/ceph/journaler.h | 2 +- net/ceph/journaler.c | 834 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 835 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/journaler.h b/include/linux/ceph/journaler.h index e3b82af..f04fb3f 100644 --- a/include/linux/ceph/journaler.h +++ b/include/linux/ceph/journaler.h @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline uint64_t ceph_journaler_get_max_append_size(struct ceph_journaler struct ceph_journaler_ctx *ceph_journaler_ctx_alloc(void); void ceph_journaler_ctx_put(struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx); int ceph_journaler_append(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, - uint64_t tag_tid, uint64_t *commit_tid, + uint64_t tag_tid, struct ceph_journaler_ctx *ctx); void ceph_journaler_client_committed(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, uint64_t commit_tid);These declarations should be added in this patch, not earlier.
They should be. I put them in generic journaling commit just for my lazy :p
diff --git a/net/ceph/journaler.c b/net/ceph/journaler.c index 3e92e96..26a5b97 100644 --- a/net/ceph/journaler.c +++ b/net/ceph/journaler.c @@ -29,6 +29,42 @@ static char *object_oid_prefix(int pool_id, const char *journal_id) return prefix; } +static void journaler_flush(struct work_struct *work); +static void journaler_client_commit(struct work_struct *work); +static void journaler_notify_update(struct work_struct *work); +static void journaler_overflow(struct work_struct *work); +static void journaler_append_finish(struct work_struct *work); + +/* + * Append got through the following state machine: + * + * JOURNALER_APPEND_START + * | + * v + * ..>. . . JOURNALER_APPEND_SEND . . . . + * . | . + * JOURNALER_APPEND_OVERFLOW | . + * | . + * ^ v v + * .. . . . JOURNALER_APPEND_FLUSH . . >. . + * | . + * v (error) + * JOURNALER_APPEND_SAFE v + * | . + * v . + * JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH . < . . + * + * Append starts in JOURNALER_APPEND_START and ends in JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH + */ +enum journaler_append_state { + JOURNALER_APPEND_START = 1, + JOURNALER_APPEND_SEND, + JOURNALER_APPEND_FLUSH, + JOURNALER_APPEND_OVERFLOW, + JOURNALER_APPEND_SAFE, + JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH, +}; + /* * journaler_append_ctx is an internal structure to represent an append op. */ @@ -44,6 +80,7 @@ struct journaler_append_ctx { struct ceph_journaler_entry entry; struct ceph_journaler_ctx journaler_ctx; + enum journaler_append_state state; struct kref kref; }; @@ -151,6 +188,12 @@ struct ceph_journaler *ceph_journaler_create(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc, if (!journaler->notify_wq) goto err_destroy_task_wq; + INIT_WORK(&journaler->flush_work, journaler_flush); + INIT_WORK(&journaler->finish_work, journaler_append_finish); + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&journaler->commit_work, journaler_client_commit); + INIT_WORK(&journaler->notify_update_work, journaler_notify_update); + INIT_WORK(&journaler->overflow_work, journaler_overflow);Why do these functions need a workqueue? Except for commit_work which runs on a schedule, why journaler_flush() can't be called directly from the append state machine? Same for journaler_overflow()? journaler_notify_update() is queued from more places, but I don't see a reason for a workqueue for it either.
Because these works are for the whole journaler.There are more than one caller for them but actually we need it to run only once when there are more than one caller at the same time. So use a workqueue to solve the race problem
for them.
+ journaler->fetch_buf = NULL; journaler->handle_entry = NULL; journaler->entry_handler = NULL; @@ -1287,3 +1330,794 @@ int ceph_journaler_start_replay(struct ceph_journaler *journaler) return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_journaler_start_replay); + +// recording +static int get_new_entry_tid(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, + uint64_t tag_tid, uint64_t *entry_tid) +{ + struct entry_tid *pos; + + spin_lock(&journaler->entry_tid_lock); + list_for_each_entry(pos, &journaler->entry_tids, node) { + if (pos->tag_tid == tag_tid) { + *entry_tid = pos->entry_tid++; + spin_unlock(&journaler->entry_tid_lock); + return 0; + } + } + + pos = entry_tid_alloc(journaler, tag_tid); + if (!pos) { + spin_unlock(&journaler->entry_tid_lock); + pr_err("failed to allocate new entry."); + return -ENOMEM; + }This looks like a blocking memory allocation under a spinlock. If you run with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, you should see a warning.
Thanx, good catch.
+ + *entry_tid = pos->entry_tid++; + spin_unlock(&journaler->entry_tid_lock); + + return 0; +} + +static uint64_t get_object(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, uint64_t splay_offset) +{ + return splay_offset + (journaler->splay_width * journaler->active_set); +} + +static void future_init(struct ceph_journaler_future *future, + uint64_t tag_tid, + uint64_t entry_tid, + uint64_t commit_tid, + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx) +{ + future->tag_tid = tag_tid; + future->entry_tid = entry_tid; + future->commit_tid = commit_tid; + + spin_lock_init(&future->lock); + future->safe = false; + future->consistent = false; + + future->ctx = journaler_ctx; + future->wait = NULL; +} + +static void set_prev_future(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx) +{ + struct ceph_journaler_future *future = &append_ctx->future; + bool prev_future_finished = false; + + if (journaler->prev_future == NULL) { + prev_future_finished = true; + } else { + spin_lock(&journaler->prev_future->lock); + prev_future_finished = (journaler->prev_future->consistent && + journaler->prev_future->safe); + journaler->prev_future->wait = append_ctx; + spin_unlock(&journaler->prev_future->lock); + } + + spin_lock(&future->lock); + if (prev_future_finished) { + future->consistent = true; + } + spin_unlock(&future->lock); + + journaler->prev_future = future; +} + +static void entry_init(struct ceph_journaler_entry *entry, + uint64_t tag_tid, + uint64_t entry_tid, + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx) +{ + entry->tag_tid = tag_tid; + entry->entry_tid = entry_tid; + entry->data_len = journaler_ctx->bio_len + + journaler_ctx->prefix_len + journaler_ctx->suffix_len; +} + +static void journaler_entry_encode_prefix(struct ceph_journaler_entry *entry, + void **p, void *end) +{ + ceph_encode_64(p, PREAMBLE); + ceph_encode_8(p, (uint8_t)1);No need to cast here.
ok
+ ceph_encode_64(p, entry->entry_tid); + ceph_encode_64(p, entry->tag_tid); + + ceph_encode_32(p, entry->data_len); +} + +static uint32_t crc_bio(uint32_t crc, struct bio *bio, u64 length) +{ + struct bio_vec bv; + struct bvec_iter iter; + char *buf; + u64 offset = 0; + u64 len = length; + +next: + bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, iter) { + buf = page_address(bv.bv_page) + bv.bv_offset; + len = min_t(u64, length, bv.bv_len); + crc = crc32c(crc, buf, len); + offset += len; + length -= len; + + if (length == 0) + goto out; + } + + if (length && bio->bi_next) { + bio = bio->bi_next; + goto next; + } + + WARN_ON(length != 0); +out: + return crc; +}Use ceph_bio_iter_advance_step(), similar to zero_bios() in rbd.c.
okey
+ +static void journaler_append_finish(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = container_of(work, struct ceph_journaler, + finish_work); + struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx_pos, *next; + LIST_HEAD(tmp_list); + + spin_lock(&journaler->finish_lock); + list_splice_init(&journaler->finish_list, &tmp_list); + spin_unlock(&journaler->finish_lock); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx_pos, next, &tmp_list, node) { + list_del(&ctx_pos->node); + ctx_pos->journaler_ctx.callback(&ctx_pos->journaler_ctx); + } +} + +static void journaler_handle_append(struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx, int ret); +static void future_consistent(struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx, + int result) { + struct ceph_journaler_future *future = &append_ctx->future; + bool future_finished = false; + + spin_lock(&future->lock); + future->consistent = true; + future_finished = (future->safe && future->consistent); + spin_unlock(&future->lock); + + if (future_finished) { + append_ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH; + journaler_handle_append(append_ctx, result); + } +} + +static void future_finish(struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx, + int result) { + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = append_ctx->journaler; + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx = &append_ctx->journaler_ctx; + struct ceph_journaler_future *future = &append_ctx->future; + struct journaler_append_ctx *wait = future->wait; + + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock); + if (journaler->prev_future == future) + journaler->prev_future = NULL; + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + + spin_lock(&journaler->finish_lock); + if (journaler_ctx->result == 0) + journaler_ctx->result = result; + list_add_tail(&append_ctx->node, &journaler->finish_list); + spin_unlock(&journaler->finish_lock); + + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->finish_work); + if (wait) + future_consistent(wait, result); +} + +static void journaler_notify_update(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = container_of(work, + struct ceph_journaler, + notify_update_work); + int ret = 0; + + ret = ceph_osdc_notify(journaler->osdc, &journaler->header_oid, + &journaler->header_oloc, NULL, 0, + 5000, NULL, NULL);This needs a define for 5000.
agreed
+ if (ret) + pr_err("notify_update failed: %d", ret); +} + +// advance the active_set to (active_set + 1). This function +// will call ceph_cls_journaler_set_active_set to update journal +// metadata and notify all clients about this event. We don't +// update journaler->active_set in memory currently. +// +// The journaler->active_set will be updated in refresh() when +// we get the notification. +static void advance_object_set(struct ceph_journaler *journaler) +{ + struct object_recorder *obj_recorder; + uint64_t active_set; + int i, ret; + + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock); + if (journaler->advancing || journaler->flushing) { + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + return; + } + + // make sure all inflight appending finish + for (i = 0; i < journaler->splay_width; i++) { + obj_recorder = &journaler->obj_recorders[i]; + spin_lock(&obj_recorder->lock); + if (obj_recorder->inflight_append) { + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + return; + } + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); + } + + journaler->advancing = true; + + active_set = journaler->active_set + 1; + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + + ret = ceph_cls_journaler_set_active_set(journaler->osdc, + &journaler->header_oid, &journaler->header_oloc, + active_set); + if (ret) { + pr_err("error in set active_set: %d", ret); + } + + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->notify_update_work); +} + +static void journaler_overflow(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = container_of(work, + struct ceph_journaler, + overflow_work); + advance_object_set(journaler); +} + +static void journaler_append_callback(struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req) +{ + struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx = osd_req->r_priv; + int ret = osd_req->r_result; + + if (ret) + pr_debug("ret of journaler_append_callback: %d", ret); + + __free_page(ctx->req_page); + ceph_osdc_put_request(osd_req); + + journaler_handle_append(ctx, ret); +} + +static int append(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, + struct ceph_object_id *oid, + struct ceph_object_locator *oloc, + struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx) + +{ + struct ceph_osd_client *osdc = journaler->osdc; + struct ceph_osd_request *req; + void *p; + int ret; + + req = ceph_osdc_alloc_request(osdc, NULL, 2, false, GFP_NOIO); + if (!req) + return -ENOMEM; + + ceph_oid_copy(&req->r_base_oid, oid); + ceph_oloc_copy(&req->r_base_oloc, oloc); + req->r_flags = CEPH_OSD_FLAG_WRITE; + req->r_callback = journaler_append_callback; + req->r_priv = ctx; + + // guard_append + ctx->req_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOIO); + if (!ctx->req_page) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out_req; + }I think this allocation is unnecessary. You are allocating three pages for each append: for prefix, for suffix and for guard_append. Given that the prefix is just a few dozen bytes, the suffix is eight bytes and guard_append needs just four bytes, a single page should be more than enough.
sounds correct. I will check how to share page in prefix, suffix and a write op.
+ p = page_address(ctx->req_page); + ceph_encode_64(&p, 1 << journaler->order); + ret = osd_req_op_cls_init(req, 0, "journal", "guard_append"); + if (ret) + goto out_free_page; + osd_req_op_cls_request_data_pages(req, 0, &ctx->req_page, 8, 0, false, false); + + // append_data + osd_req_op_extent_init(req, 1, CEPH_OSD_OP_APPEND, 0, + ctx->journaler_ctx.prefix_len + ctx->journaler_ctx.bio_len + ctx->journaler_ctx.suffix_len, 0, 0); + + if (ctx->journaler_ctx.prefix_len) + osd_req_op_extent_prefix_pages(req, 1, &ctx->journaler_ctx.prefix_page, + ctx->journaler_ctx.prefix_len, + ctx->journaler_ctx.prefix_offset, + false, false); + + if (ctx->journaler_ctx.bio_len) + osd_req_op_extent_osd_data_bio(req, 1, &ctx->journaler_ctx.bio_iter, ctx->journaler_ctx.bio_len); + + if (ctx->journaler_ctx.suffix_len) + osd_req_op_extent_suffix_pages(req, 1, &ctx->journaler_ctx.suffix_page, + ctx->journaler_ctx.suffix_len, + ctx->journaler_ctx.suffix_offset, + false, false); + ret = ceph_osdc_alloc_messages(req, GFP_NOIO); + if (ret) + goto out_free_page; + + ceph_osdc_start_request(osdc, req, false); + return 0; + +out_free_page: + __free_page(ctx->req_page); +out_req: + ceph_osdc_put_request(req); + return ret; +} + +static int send_append_request(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, + uint64_t object_num, + struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx) +{ + struct ceph_object_id object_oid; + int ret = 0; + + ceph_oid_init(&object_oid); + ret = ceph_oid_aprintf(&object_oid, GFP_NOIO, "%s%llu", + journaler->object_oid_prefix, object_num); + if (ret) { + pr_err("failed to initialize object id: %d", ret); + goto out; + } + + ret = append(journaler, &object_oid, &journaler->data_oloc, ctx); +out: + ceph_oid_destroy(&object_oid); + return ret; +} + +static void journaler_flush(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = container_of(work, + struct ceph_journaler, + flush_work); + int i = 0; + struct object_recorder *obj_recorder; + struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx, *next_ctx; + LIST_HEAD(tmp); + + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock); + if (journaler->overflowed) { + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + return; + } + + journaler->flushing = true; + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + + for (i = 0; i < journaler->splay_width; i++) { + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp); + obj_recorder = &journaler->obj_recorders[i]; + + spin_lock(&obj_recorder->lock); + list_splice_tail_init(&obj_recorder->overflow_list, &tmp); + list_splice_tail_init(&obj_recorder->append_list, &tmp); + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(ctx, next_ctx, &tmp, node) { + list_del(&ctx->node); + ctx->object_num = get_object(journaler, obj_recorder->splay_offset); + journaler_handle_append(ctx, 0); + } + } + + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock); + journaler->flushing = false; + // As we don't do advance in flushing, so queue another overflow_work + // after flushing finished if we journaler is overflowed. + if (journaler->overflowed) + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->overflow_work); + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); +} + +static void ceph_journaler_object_append(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx) +{ + void *buf, *end; + uint32_t crc = 0; + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx = &append_ctx->journaler_ctx; + struct ceph_bio_iter *bio_iter = &journaler_ctx->bio_iter; + struct object_recorder *obj_recorder; + + // PEAMBLE(8) + version(1) + entry_tid(8) + tag_tid(8) + string_len(4) = 29 + journaler_ctx->prefix_offset -= 29; + journaler_ctx->prefix_len += 29; + buf = page_address(journaler_ctx->prefix_page) + journaler_ctx->prefix_offset; + end = buf + 29; + journaler_entry_encode_prefix(&append_ctx->entry, &buf, end); + + // size of crc is 4 + journaler_ctx->suffix_offset += 0; + journaler_ctx->suffix_len += 4; + buf = page_address(journaler_ctx->suffix_page); + end = buf + 4; + crc = crc32c(crc, page_address(journaler_ctx->prefix_page) + journaler_ctx->prefix_offset, + journaler_ctx->prefix_len); + if (journaler_ctx->bio_len) + crc = crc_bio(crc, bio_iter->bio, journaler_ctx->bio_len);Looks like ceph_journaler_object_append() is called for each append chunk (max_append_size), but you are always checksumming the entire bio?
->bio_iter in journaler_ctx is advanced for this chunk when split event into chunks in rbd level.
+ ceph_encode_32(&buf, crc); + obj_recorder = &journaler->obj_recorders[append_ctx->splay_offset]; + + spin_lock(&obj_recorder->lock); + list_add_tail(&append_ctx->node, &obj_recorder->append_list); + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->flush_work); + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); +} + +static void journaler_handle_append(struct journaler_append_ctx *ctx, int ret) +{ + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = ctx->journaler; + struct object_recorder *obj_recorder = &journaler->obj_recorders[ctx->splay_offset]; + +again: + switch (ctx->state) { + case JOURNALER_APPEND_START: + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_SEND; + ceph_journaler_object_append(journaler, ctx); + break; + case JOURNALER_APPEND_SEND: + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_FLUSH; + spin_lock(&obj_recorder->lock); + obj_recorder->inflight_append++; + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); + ret = send_append_request(journaler, ctx->object_num, ctx); + if (ret) { + pr_err("failed to send append request: %d", ret); + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH; + goto again; + } + break; + case JOURNALER_APPEND_FLUSH: + if (ret == -EOVERFLOW) { + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock); + journaler->overflowed = true; + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + + spin_lock(&obj_recorder->lock); + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_OVERFLOW; + list_add_tail(&ctx->node, &obj_recorder->overflow_list); + if (--obj_recorder->inflight_append == 0) + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->overflow_work); + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); + break; + } + + spin_lock(&obj_recorder->lock); + if (--obj_recorder->inflight_append == 0) { + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock);Acquiring a mutex is a blocking operation, can't do it while holding a spinlock.
okey
+ if (journaler->overflowed) + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->overflow_work); + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + } + spin_unlock(&obj_recorder->lock); + + ret = add_commit_entry(journaler, ctx->future.commit_tid, ctx->object_num, + ctx->future.tag_tid, ctx->future.entry_tid); + if (ret) { + pr_err("failed to add_commit_entry: %d", ret); + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH; + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto again; + } + + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_SAFE; + goto again; + case JOURNALER_APPEND_OVERFLOW: + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_SEND; + goto again; + case JOURNALER_APPEND_SAFE: + spin_lock(&ctx->future.lock); + ctx->future.safe = true; + if (ctx->future.consistent) { + spin_unlock(&ctx->future.lock); + ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH; + goto again; + } + spin_unlock(&ctx->future.lock); + break; + case JOURNALER_APPEND_FINISH: + future_finish(ctx, ret); + break; + default: + BUG(); + } +} + +// journaler_append_ctx alloc and release +struct journaler_append_ctx *journaler_append_ctx_alloc(void) +{ + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx; + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx; + + append_ctx = kmem_cache_zalloc(journaler_append_ctx_cache, GFP_NOIO); + if (!append_ctx) + return NULL; + + journaler_ctx = &append_ctx->journaler_ctx; + journaler_ctx->prefix_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOIO); + if (!journaler_ctx->prefix_page) + goto free_journaler_ctx; + + journaler_ctx->suffix_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOIO); + if (!journaler_ctx->suffix_page) + goto free_prefix_page; + + memset(page_address(journaler_ctx->prefix_page), 0, PAGE_SIZE); + memset(page_address(journaler_ctx->suffix_page), 0, PAGE_SIZE);Why zero here?
Not necessary strictly, just want to initialize after allocating and before using.
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&journaler_ctx->node); + + kref_init(&append_ctx->kref); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&append_ctx->node); + return append_ctx; + +free_prefix_page: + __free_page(journaler_ctx->prefix_page); +free_journaler_ctx: + kmem_cache_free(journaler_append_ctx_cache, append_ctx); + return NULL; +} + +struct ceph_journaler_ctx *ceph_journaler_ctx_alloc(void) +{ + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx; + + append_ctx = journaler_append_ctx_alloc(); + if (!append_ctx) + return NULL; + + return &append_ctx->journaler_ctx; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_journaler_ctx_alloc); + +static void journaler_append_ctx_release(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx; + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx; + + append_ctx = container_of(kref, struct journaler_append_ctx, kref); + journaler_ctx = &append_ctx->journaler_ctx; + + __free_page(journaler_ctx->prefix_page); + __free_page(journaler_ctx->suffix_page); + kmem_cache_free(journaler_append_ctx_cache, append_ctx); +} + +static void journaler_append_ctx_put(struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx) +{ + if (append_ctx) { + kref_put(&append_ctx->kref, journaler_append_ctx_release);AFAICT this kref is initialized to 1 and never incremented. Is it actually needed?
That's introduced in a developing version which will be multi-refered. But now
it looks not actually needed.
+ } +} + +void ceph_journaler_ctx_put(struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx) +{ + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx; + + if (journaler_ctx) { + append_ctx = container_of(journaler_ctx, + struct journaler_append_ctx, + journaler_ctx); + journaler_append_ctx_put(append_ctx); + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_journaler_ctx_put); + +int ceph_journaler_append(struct ceph_journaler *journaler, + uint64_t tag_tid, + struct ceph_journaler_ctx *journaler_ctx) +{ + uint64_t entry_tid; + struct object_recorder *obj_recorder; + struct journaler_append_ctx *append_ctx; + int ret; + + append_ctx = container_of(journaler_ctx, + struct journaler_append_ctx, + journaler_ctx); + + append_ctx->journaler = journaler; + mutex_lock(&journaler->meta_lock); + // get entry_tid for this event. (tag_tid, entry_tid) is + // the uniq id for every journal event. + ret = get_new_entry_tid(journaler, tag_tid, &entry_tid); + if (ret) { + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + return ret; + } + + // calculate the object_num for this entry. + append_ctx->splay_offset = entry_tid % journaler->splay_width; + obj_recorder = &journaler->obj_recorders[journaler->splay_width]; + append_ctx->object_num = get_object(journaler, append_ctx->splay_offset); + + // allocate a commit_tid for this event, when the data is committed + // to data objects, ceph_journaler_client_committed() will accept + // the commit_tid to understand how to update journal commit position. + journaler_ctx->commit_tid = __allocate_commit_tid(journaler); + entry_init(&append_ctx->entry, tag_tid, entry_tid, journaler_ctx); + + // To make sure the journal entry is consistent, we use future + // to track it. And every journal entry depent on the previous + // entry. Only if the previous entry is finished, current entry + // could be consistent. and then we can finish current entry. + future_init(&append_ctx->future, tag_tid, entry_tid, + journaler_ctx->commit_tid, journaler_ctx); + set_prev_future(journaler, append_ctx); + mutex_unlock(&journaler->meta_lock); + + append_ctx->state = JOURNALER_APPEND_START; + journaler_handle_append(append_ctx, 0); + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_journaler_append); + +static void journaler_client_commit(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct ceph_journaler *journaler = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), + struct ceph_journaler, + commit_work); + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&journaler->commit_lock); + copy_pos_list(&journaler->obj_pos_pending, + &journaler->obj_pos_committing); + mutex_unlock(&journaler->commit_lock); + + ret = ceph_cls_journaler_client_committed(journaler->osdc, + &journaler->header_oid, &journaler->header_oloc, + journaler->client, &journaler->obj_pos_committing); + + if (ret) { + pr_err("error in client committed: %d", ret); + } + + queue_work(journaler->task_wq, &journaler->notify_update_work); + + mutex_lock(&journaler->commit_lock); + journaler->commit_scheduled = false; + mutex_unlock(&journaler->commit_lock); +} + +// hold journaler->commit_lockThis can be enforced with lockdep_assert_held() macro.
okey
+static void add_object_position(struct commit_entry *entry, + struct list_head *object_positions, + uint64_t splay_width) +{ + struct ceph_journaler_object_pos *position; + uint8_t splay_offset = entry->object_num % splay_width; + bool found = false; + + list_for_each_entry(position, object_positions, node) { + if (position->in_using == false) { + found = true; + break; + } + + if (splay_offset == position->object_num % splay_width) { + found = true; + break; + }Combine these into a single if?
agreed
+ } + + BUG_ON(!found); + if (position->in_using == false) + position->in_using = true;Set ->in_using unconditionally?
Yes, when we found in_using == false, that means this position is allocated but not used. set true to tag it as used.
Thanx
Thanks,
Ilya
