Re: [PATCH 15/20] libceph: bump CEPH_MSG_MAX_DATA_LEN (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 16:41 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> This time for rbd object map.  Object maps are limited in size to
> 256000000 objects, two bits per object.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/ceph/libceph.h | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/libceph.h b/include/linux/ceph/libceph.h
> index 337d5049ff93..0ae60b55e55a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ceph/libceph.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/libceph.h
> @@ -84,11 +84,13 @@ struct ceph_options {
>  #define CEPH_MSG_MAX_MIDDLE_LEN	(16*1024*1024)
>  
>  /*
> - * Handle the largest possible rbd object in one message.
> + * The largest possible rbd data object is 32M.
> + * The largest possible rbd object map object is 64M.
> + *
>   * There is no limit on the size of cephfs objects, but it has to obey
>   * rsize and wsize mount options anyway.
>   */
> -#define CEPH_MSG_MAX_DATA_LEN	(32*1024*1024)
> +#define CEPH_MSG_MAX_DATA_LEN	(64*1024*1024)
>  
>  #define CEPH_AUTH_NAME_DEFAULT   "guest"
>  

Does this value serve any real purpose? I know we use this to cap cephfs
rsize/wsize values, but other than that, it's only used in
read_partial_message:

        data_len = le32_to_cpu(con->in_hdr.data_len);
        if (data_len > CEPH_MSG_MAX_DATA_LEN)
                return -EIO;

I guess this is supposed to be some sort of sanity check, but it seems a
bit arbitrary, and something that ought to be handled more naturally by
other limits later in the code.
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux