On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:08:43PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:26 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:15:00PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > > > This barrier only applies to the read-modify-write operations; in > > > particular, it does not apply to the atomic64_set() primitive. > > > > > > Replace the barrier with an smp_mb(). > > > > > > > > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static inline void __ceph_dir_set_complete(struct ceph_inode_info *ci, > > > long long release_count, > > > long long ordered_count) > > > { > > > - smp_mb__before_atomic(); > > > > same > > /* > > * XXX: the comment that explain this barrier goes here. > > */ > > > > makes sure operations that setup readdir cache (update page cache and > i_size) are strongly ordered with following atomic64_set. Thanks for the suggestion, Yan. To be clear: would you like me to integrate your comment and resend? any other suggestions? Thanx, Andrea > > > > + smp_mb(); > > > > > atomic64_set(&ci->i_complete_seq[0], release_count); > > > atomic64_set(&ci->i_complete_seq[1], ordered_count); > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.7.4 > > >