Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] libceph: fix unaligned accesses in ceph_entity_addr handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 17:42 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:38 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > GCC9 is throwing a lot of warnings about unaligned access. This patch
> > fixes some of them by changing most of the sockaddr handling functions
> > to take a pointer to struct ceph_entity_addr instead of struct
> > sockaddr_storage.  The lower functions can then make copies or do
> > unaligned accesses as needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/ceph/messenger.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/ceph/messenger.c b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> > index 3083988ce729..3cb8ce385fce 100644
> > --- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
> > +++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
> > @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void set_sock_callbacks(struct socket *sock,
> >   */
> >  static int ceph_tcp_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
> >  {
> > -       struct sockaddr_storage *paddr = &con->peer_addr.in_addr;
> > +       struct sockaddr_storage addr = con->peer_addr.in_addr; /* align */
> >         struct socket *sock;
> >         unsigned int noio_flag;
> >         int ret;
> > @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ static int ceph_tcp_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
> > 
> >         /* sock_create_kern() allocates with GFP_KERNEL */
> >         noio_flag = memalloc_noio_save();
> > -       ret = sock_create_kern(read_pnet(&con->msgr->net), paddr->ss_family,
> > +       ret = sock_create_kern(read_pnet(&con->msgr->net), addr.ss_family,
> >                                SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP, &sock);
> >         memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag);
> >         if (ret)
> > @@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static int ceph_tcp_connect(struct ceph_connection *con)
> >         dout("connect %s\n", ceph_pr_addr(&con->peer_addr.in_addr));
> > 
> >         con_sock_state_connecting(con);
> > -       ret = sock->ops->connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)paddr, sizeof(*paddr),
> > +       ret = sock->ops->connect(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr),
> >                                  O_NONBLOCK);
> >         if (ret == -EINPROGRESS) {
> >                 dout("connect %s EINPROGRESS sk_state = %u\n",
> > @@ -1795,12 +1795,13 @@ static int verify_hello(struct ceph_connection *con)
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > -static bool addr_is_blank(struct sockaddr_storage *ss)
> > +static bool addr_is_blank(struct ceph_entity_addr *ea)
> >  {
> > -       struct in_addr *addr = &((struct sockaddr_in *)ss)->sin_addr;
> > -       struct in6_addr *addr6 = &((struct sockaddr_in6 *)ss)->sin6_addr;
> > +       struct sockaddr_storage ss = ea->in_addr;
> > +       struct in_addr *addr = &((struct sockaddr_in *)&ss)->sin_addr;
> > +       struct in6_addr *addr6 = &((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&ss)->sin6_addr;
> > 
> > -       switch (ss->ss_family) {
> > +       switch (ss.ss_family) {
> >         case AF_INET:
> >                 return addr->s_addr == htonl(INADDR_ANY);
> >         case AF_INET6:
> > @@ -1810,25 +1811,25 @@ static bool addr_is_blank(struct sockaddr_storage *ss)
> >         }
> >  }
> > 
> > -static int addr_port(struct sockaddr_storage *ss)
> > +static int addr_port(struct ceph_entity_addr *ea)
> >  {
> > -       switch (ss->ss_family) {
> > +       switch (get_unaligned(&ea->in_addr.ss_family)) {
> >         case AF_INET:
> > -               return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in *)ss)->sin_port);
> > +               return ntohs(get_unaligned(&((struct sockaddr_in *)&ea->in_addr)->sin_port));
> >         case AF_INET6:
> > -               return ntohs(((struct sockaddr_in6 *)ss)->sin6_port);
> > +               return ntohs(get_unaligned(&((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&ea->in_addr)->sin6_port));
> >         }
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > -static void addr_set_port(struct sockaddr_storage *ss, int p)
> > +static void addr_set_port(struct ceph_entity_addr *addr, int p)
> >  {
> > -       switch (ss->ss_family) {
> > +       switch (get_unaligned(&addr->in_addr.ss_family)) {
> >         case AF_INET:
> > -               ((struct sockaddr_in *)ss)->sin_port = htons(p);
> > +               put_unaligned(htons(p), &((struct sockaddr_in *)&addr->in_addr)->sin_port);
> >                 break;
> >         case AF_INET6:
> > -               ((struct sockaddr_in6 *)ss)->sin6_port = htons(p);
> > +               put_unaligned(htons(p), &((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&addr->in_addr)->sin6_port);
> >                 break;
> >         }
> >  }
> > @@ -1836,21 +1837,18 @@ static void addr_set_port(struct sockaddr_storage *ss, int p)
> >  /*
> >   * Unlike other *_pton function semantics, zero indicates success.
> >   */
> > -static int ceph_pton(const char *str, size_t len, struct sockaddr_storage *ss,
> > +static int ceph_pton(const char *str, size_t len, struct ceph_entity_addr *addr,
> >                 char delim, const char **ipend)
> >  {
> > -       struct sockaddr_in *in4 = (struct sockaddr_in *) ss;
> > -       struct sockaddr_in6 *in6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) ss;
> > -
> > -       memset(ss, 0, sizeof(*ss));
> > +       memset(&addr->in_addr, 0, sizeof(addr->in_addr));
> > 
> > -       if (in4_pton(str, len, (u8 *)&in4->sin_addr.s_addr, delim, ipend)) {
> > -               ss->ss_family = AF_INET;
> > +       if (in4_pton(str, len, (u8 *)&((struct sockaddr_in *)&addr->in_addr)->sin_addr.s_addr, delim, ipend)) {
> > +               put_unaligned(AF_INET, &addr->in_addr.ss_family);
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> > 
> > -       if (in6_pton(str, len, (u8 *)&in6->sin6_addr.s6_addr, delim, ipend)) {
> > -               ss->ss_family = AF_INET6;
> > +       if (in6_pton(str, len, (u8 *)&((struct sockaddr_in6 *)&addr->in_addr)->sin6_addr.s6_addr, delim, ipend)) {
> > +               put_unaligned(AF_INET6, &addr->in_addr.ss_family);
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> > 
> > @@ -1862,7 +1860,7 @@ static int ceph_pton(const char *str, size_t len, struct sockaddr_storage *ss,
> >   */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CEPH_LIB_USE_DNS_RESOLVER
> >  static int ceph_dns_resolve_name(const char *name, size_t namelen,
> > -               struct sockaddr_storage *ss, char delim, const char **ipend)
> > +               struct ceph_entity_addr *addr, char delim, const char **ipend)
> >  {
> >         const char *end, *delim_p;
> >         char *colon_p, *ip_addr = NULL;
> > @@ -1891,7 +1889,7 @@ static int ceph_dns_resolve_name(const char *name, size_t namelen,
> >         /* do dns_resolve upcall */
> >         ip_len = dns_query(NULL, name, end - name, NULL, &ip_addr, NULL);
> >         if (ip_len > 0)
> > -               ret = ceph_pton(ip_addr, ip_len, ss, -1, NULL);
> > +               ret = ceph_pton(ip_addr, ip_len, addr, -1, NULL);
> >         else
> >                 ret = -ESRCH;
> > 
> > @@ -1900,13 +1898,13 @@ static int ceph_dns_resolve_name(const char *name, size_t namelen,
> >         *ipend = end;
> > 
> >         pr_info("resolve '%.*s' (ret=%d): %s\n", (int)(end - name), name,
> > -                       ret, ret ? "failed" : ceph_pr_addr(ss));
> > +                       ret, ret ? "failed" : ceph_pr_addr(&addr->in_addr));
> > 
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >  #else
> >  static inline int ceph_dns_resolve_name(const char *name, size_t namelen,
> > -               struct sockaddr_storage *ss, char delim, const char **ipend)
> > +               struct ceph_entity_addr *addr, char delim, const char **ipend)
> >  {
> >         return -EINVAL;
> >  }
> > @@ -1917,13 +1915,13 @@ static inline int ceph_dns_resolve_name(const char *name, size_t namelen,
> >   * then try to extract a hostname to resolve using userspace DNS upcall.
> >   */
> >  static int ceph_parse_server_name(const char *name, size_t namelen,
> > -                       struct sockaddr_storage *ss, char delim, const char **ipend)
> > +               struct ceph_entity_addr *addr, char delim, const char **ipend)
> >  {
> >         int ret;
> > 
> > -       ret = ceph_pton(name, namelen, ss, delim, ipend);
> > +       ret = ceph_pton(name, namelen, addr, delim, ipend);
> >         if (ret)
> > -               ret = ceph_dns_resolve_name(name, namelen, ss, delim, ipend);
> > +               ret = ceph_dns_resolve_name(name, namelen, addr, delim, ipend);
> > 
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -1942,7 +1940,6 @@ int ceph_parse_ips(const char *c, const char *end,
> >         dout("parse_ips on '%.*s'\n", (int)(end-c), c);
> >         for (i = 0; i < max_count; i++) {
> >                 const char *ipend;
> > -               struct sockaddr_storage *ss = &addr[i].in_addr;
> >                 int port;
> >                 char delim = ',';
> > 
> > @@ -1951,7 +1948,7 @@ int ceph_parse_ips(const char *c, const char *end,
> >                         p++;
> >                 }
> > 
> > -               ret = ceph_parse_server_name(p, end - p, ss, delim, &ipend);
> > +               ret = ceph_parse_server_name(p, end - p, &addr[i], delim, &ipend);
> >                 if (ret)
> >                         goto bad;
> >                 ret = -EINVAL;
> > @@ -1982,9 +1979,9 @@ int ceph_parse_ips(const char *c, const char *end,
> >                         port = CEPH_MON_PORT;
> >                 }
> > 
> > -               addr_set_port(ss, port);
> > +               addr_set_port(&addr[i], port);
> > 
> > -               dout("parse_ips got %s\n", ceph_pr_addr(ss));
> > +               dout("parse_ips got %s\n", ceph_pr_addr(&addr[i].in_addr));
> > 
> >                 if (p == end)
> >                         break;
> > @@ -2023,7 +2020,7 @@ static int process_banner(struct ceph_connection *con)
> >          */
> >         if (memcmp(&con->peer_addr, &con->actual_peer_addr,
> >                    sizeof(con->peer_addr)) != 0 &&
> > -           !(addr_is_blank(&con->actual_peer_addr.in_addr) &&
> > +           !(addr_is_blank(&con->peer_addr_for_me) &&
> 
> actual_peer_addr -> peer_addr_for_me, this is a typo, right?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>                 Ilya

Yes! Good catch. Mind fixing that up before merge, or would you rather I
resend after testing again?
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux