Re: fsyncgate and ceph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 09:22 +0100, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Does anyone know if ceph and level/rocksdb are already immune to these
> fsync issues discovered by the postgresql devs?
> 
>     https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/postgresql_fsync/
>     https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Fsync_Errors
>     https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMsr%2BYHh%2B5Oq4xziwwoEfhoTZgr07vdGG%2Bhu%3D1adXx59aTeaoQ%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> Cheers, Dan

Great question. I took a brief look at the rocksdb code but wasn't able
to draw a meaningful conclusion there.

I do see that you can set it up to use O_DIRECT, but it's not clear to
me that propagates fsync errors in a meaningful way if you don't. I'm
also not sure how ceph configures rocksdb to operate here either.

I think it'd be good to reach out to the rocksdb developers and see
whether they've considered its behavior in the face of a writeback
failure. I'm happy to discuss with them if they have questions about the
kernel's behavior.

Cheers,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux