Re: single-threaded seastar-osd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:42 PM kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> recently, when we are working on cross-core messenger[0], we found
> that, in order to share the connection between cores we need to have
> types like "seastar::lw_shared_ptr<seastar::foreign_ptr<ConnectionRef>>",
> because
> - the connections to peer OSDs are shared across cores,
> - the connections are shared by multiple continuations on the local
> core -- either locally or remotely.

Well, I perceive this type as a clever solution to get back some of
the properties seastar::foreign_ptr had taken from us. What worries
me is that we need such heavy artillery at the very early stage of
project life.

> and we need to perform i/o on the core where the connection is
> established.

Many problems can be resolved by introducing another indirection
layer. This becomes harder if a pointer that should be wrapped with
foreign_ptr resides in a third-party component.

Regards,
Radek



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux