Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
From: Mykola Golub <to.my.trociny@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:57:19 +0200
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1810301315040.3346@piezo.novalocal>
References: <20181029190832.GA20203@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1810291933550.3346@piezo.novalocal> <20181030073800.GA13594@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1810301315040.3346@piezo.novalocal>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:16:00PM +0000, Sage Weil wrote:

> > Do we want PRs for these?
> 
> Yes, please!

I will do. Thanks

-- 
Mykola Golub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
  - From: Mykola Golub

References:
- Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
  - From: Mykola Golub
- Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
  - From: Sage Weil
- Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
  - From: Mykola Golub
- Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
  - From: Sage Weil

Prev by Date: Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
Next by Date: Re: librados3
Previous by thread: Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
Next by thread: Re: Potential deadlock in PG::_scan_snaps?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [CEPH Users] [Ceph Large] [Information on CEPH] [Linux BTRFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux