On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 6:36 PM Noah Watkins <nwatkins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:06 AM Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > There are a couple of reasons why 'deactivate' hasn't made it into > > ceph-volume. One of them is that, it wasn't clear (to me) if > > deactivation meant full removal/purging of the OSD or if > > it meant to leave it in a state where it wouldn't start (e.g. > > disabling the systemd units). > > > > My guess is that there is a need for both and for a few more use > > cases, like disabling the systemd unit so that the same OSD can be > > provisioned. So far we've concentrated in the creation of OSDs > > surpassing ceph-disk > > features, but I think that we can start exploring the complexity of > > deactivation now. > > Would it be fair to say that the blocker right now is an enumeration > of the use cases and a proposed update to the CLI command set to > handle those cases? That would surely help prioritize. Thanks Noah!
