Re: messenger performance regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Do we understand why debug mode got so much slower? Is there something
we can do to improve it?

We are for instance seeing new issues with the messenger in our
testing, apparently because the reduced speed opens up race conditions
much wider. In this case that's good for us, but it could easily go
the other way as well and I'm concerned about not finding new issues
in our testing if the difference is so substantial compared to what
will be deployed by users.
-Greg
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:18 AM Yan, Zheng <ukernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Only ceph complied in debug mode has the regression. Ceph complied in
> release mode has no regression. Sorry for the noisy.
>
> Yan, Zheng
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:46 PM Yan, Zheng <ukernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday I checked how fast ceph-mds can process requests (a client
> > keeps sending getattr request of root inode). Requests rate I got is
> > only about half of same test I did a few weeks ago. Perf profile of
> > ceph-mds shows that messenger functions used more CPU time compared to
> > mimic code. Performance result and perf profiles are at
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36561.
> >
> > Regards
> > Yan, Zheng



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux