rgw approved, thanks
i added some details to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36491 regarding
the s3a-hadoop failures. all 4 runs of the multisite tests passed, but
had cluster warnings about slow requests - i don't think we've seen
those against luminous before
On 10/22/18 12:29 PM, Neha Ojha wrote:
rados and powercycle approved.
Thanks,
Neha
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/24620 - passed tests and merged
Still awaiting leads approvals for other suites.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:57 AM Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:19 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Details of this release summarized here:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36447#note-1
rados - Josh, Neha approved ?
rgw - Casey, Matt approve? see known bugs
rbd - Jason approve? (run on default OS only)
Any chance we can get [1] merged to fix that broken test (or at least
merged shortly after release so that luminous test runs don't look
incorrectly failed)? Otherwise, approved.
krbd - Ilya approved? (run on default OS only)
fs - Patrick approve?
kcephfs - Patrick approve?
multimds - Patrick approve?
knfs - depreceted
ceph-deploy - Sage, Vasu approve? see bugs
ceph-disk PASSED
upgrade/client-upgrade-hammer (luminous) PASSED
upgrade/client-upgrade-jewel (luminous) PASSED
upgrade/luminous-p2p PASSED
upgrade/jewel-x (luminous) PASSED
upgrade/kraken-x (luminous) - approved by Josh, EOL
powercycle - Neha approve?
ceph-ansible - Sebastian approve?
ceph-volume - FAILED waiting for fix, Andrew, Alfredo approve?
(please speak up if something is missing)
Thx
YuriW
[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/24620
--
Jason
_______________________________________________
Ceph-qa mailing list
Ceph-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-qa-ceph.com
