I think it's OK to merge, but deferring to Nathan. On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:57 AM Jason Dillaman <jdillama@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:19 AM Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Details of this release summarized here: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/36447#note-1 > > > > rados - Josh, Neha approved ? > > rgw - Casey, Matt approve? see known bugs > > rbd - Jason approve? (run on default OS only) > > Any chance we can get [1] merged to fix that broken test (or at least > merged shortly after release so that luminous test runs don't look > incorrectly failed)? Otherwise, approved. > > > krbd - Ilya approved? (run on default OS only) > > fs - Patrick approve? > > kcephfs - Patrick approve? > > multimds - Patrick approve? > > knfs - depreceted > > ceph-deploy - Sage, Vasu approve? see bugs > > ceph-disk PASSED > > upgrade/client-upgrade-hammer (luminous) PASSED > > upgrade/client-upgrade-jewel (luminous) PASSED > > upgrade/luminous-p2p PASSED > > upgrade/jewel-x (luminous) PASSED > > upgrade/kraken-x (luminous) - approved by Josh, EOL > > powercycle - Neha approve? > > ceph-ansible - Sebastian approve? > > ceph-volume - FAILED waiting for fix, Andrew, Alfredo approve? > > (please speak up if something is missing) > > > > Thx > > YuriW > > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/24620 > > -- > Jason
