On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > пт, 5 окт. 2018 г. в 15:59, Paul Emmerich <paul.emmerich@xxxxxxxx>: > > > > I've also looked into handling the binary format two years ago; the > > spec is the code and it's unfortunately not the best spec ;) > > But the text version is really easy to handle, so we ended up using that. > > > > Text version needs more space =). Also ceph uses binary format and if > i want to write compatible software i need to handle binary form =( I think we're better of building the crush compile/decompile code in library form to do the encoding/decoding for you. We periodically change/extend the binary format and you're signing yourself up for future compatibility problems. sage
