Re: [Resend PATCH 1/2] ceph: introudce a variable to avoid calling refcount_read() twice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/16/2018 08:28 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:27 PM Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2018/7/13 at 下午9:05, Yan, Zheng wrote:

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:47 PM Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Calling refcount_read() twice may return different value each time,
so introduce a variable to avoid it.

Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx>
---
Sorry, I just wrote wrong email address in previous sending, so resend it.
If you have received previous email please ignore it, thanks.

  fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 10 ++++++----
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
index df0a3bb0f6a5..2a8d4cc69eb6 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/mds_client.c
@@ -399,9 +399,10 @@ const char *ceph_session_state_name(int s)

  static struct ceph_mds_session *get_session(struct ceph_mds_session *s)
  {
+
+
         if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&s->s_ref)) {
"unsigned int refcnt = refcount_read(&s->s_ref);" should be here
Yeah, indeed. Should I send revised patch?

I fixed it locally

Thank you for doing that!

Chengguang

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux