Re: [PATCH] ceph: abort osd requests on force umount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On May 17, 2018, at 01:37, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Yan, Zheng <zyan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> Sorry, I was wrong about where he hang occurs.  It’s at
>> 
>> [<0>] io_schedule+0xd/0x30
>> [<0>] wait_on_page_bit_common+0xc6/0x130
>> [<0>] __filemap_fdatawait_range+0xbd/0x100
>> [<0>] filemap_fdatawait_keep_errors+0x15/0x40
>> [<0>] sync_inodes_sb+0x1cf/0x240
>> [<0>] sync_filesystem+0x52/0x90
>> [<0>] generic_shutdown_super+0x1d/0x110
>> [<0>] ceph_kill_sb+0x28/0x80 [ceph]
>> [<0>] deactivate_locked_super+0x35/0x60
>> [<0>] cleanup_mnt+0x36/0x70
>> [<0>] task_work_run+0x79/0xa0
>> [<0>] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x62/0x70
>> [<0>] do_syscall_64+0xdb/0xf0
>> [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
>> [<0>] 0xffffffffffffffff
> 
> Makes sense, please make sure to update the commit message.
> 
> I pushed wip-umount-force and gave it a quick test.  The filesystem
> part appears to need improvement -- lots of "VFS: Busy inodes after
> unmount of ceph", more often than not with various crashes.  See the
> attached.
> 

I push a new commit to wip-umount-force, could you have a try.

Regards
Yan, Zheng


> Thanks,
> 
>                Ilya
> <busy-inodes.txt>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux