Re: mimic is forked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2018 04:57 AM, Sage Weil wrote:

> The mimic branch is now forked off of master, and the first release 

[...]

> I retargetted all the mimic branches at the mimic branch (i.e., option 2) 
> but I'm sort of thinking option 1 is less confusing.  Any strong opinions?

Just wondering: should we now push these PRs slated for the "Mimic"
milestone into the mimic branch and you will take care of merging that
branch back into trunk in the near future? Or should we change the
target branch instead and perform backports via cherry-picking? I'm fine
with the former (less work on our end), but just wanted to get
clarification.

Lenz

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH - Maxfeldstr. 5 - 90409 Nuernberg (Germany)
GF:Felix Imendörffer,Jane Smithard,Graham Norton,HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux