On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To conclude the meeting, Varada from Flipkart had a proposal to build > an “rgw scrub” which can be used in a lab (or live!) setting. He noted > that while RADOS has a very good scrubbing mechanism, there’s nothing > for RGW to ensure its higher-level data integrity, and that’s > distressing both in deployments and when making sure that tests of new > patches have correctly preserved data, rather than silently relying on > something in a caching layer. > -- Right. It is something that we really miss. It can probably be tied up with multisite DR, but not necessarily. For a single site we could pretty much only report that objects went bad (which is still useful, and probably help with tracking down corruption issues). In multi-zone environment we could use it fo actually recover data. Yehuda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
