Re: ceph mgr balancer bad distribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stefan,

Which balancer mode are you using? crush-compat scores using a mix of
nobjects, npgs, and size. It's doing pretty well over here as long as
you have a relatively small number of empty PGs.
I believe that upmap uses nPGs only, and I haven't tested it enough
yet to know if it actually improves things.

Also, did you only run one iteration of the balancer? It only moves up
to 5% of objects each iteration, so it can take several to fully
balance things.

-- dan


On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
<s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with jewel we always used the python crush optimizer which gave us a
> pretty good distribution fo the used space.
>
> Since luminous we're using the included ceph mgr balancer but the
> distribution is far from perfect and much worse than the old method.
>
> Is there any way to tune the mgr balancer?
>
> Currently after a balance we still have:
> 75% to 92% disk usage which is pretty unfair
>
> Greets,
> Stefan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux