> > PS: can we remove "ovh centos 7.4" calls from rgw luminous pls? I > think we did it on master (unless its a must) Do you have a link to the master PR/issue so that we can backport? Apparently I was wrong and Casey corrected me, Vasu made changes in s3a-hadoop tests and they require ovh to run. Vasu, is it mandatory? Can we use *any* machine? I'd prefer we have no call for specific nodes in tests. Thx YuriW On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This is the list of PRs for 12.2.4: >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/labels/wip-yuri4-testing >> >> And tests: >> >> rados >> http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-23_20:31:07-rados-wip-yuri4-testing-2018-02-23-1643-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> rerun >> http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-24_16:09:37-rados-wip-yuri4-testing-2018-02-23-1643-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> rgw >> http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-23_20:32:26-rgw-wip-yuri4-testing-2018-02-23-1643-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> rerun >> http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/yuriw-2018-02-24_16:11:53-rgw-wip-yuri4-testing-2018-02-23-1643-luminous-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> build is good >> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 148 >> >> If I get approval to merge them from core and rgw leads, I'd like to >> run a couple of test suites off the tip of luminous. > > Merged. Feel free to run your test suites. >> >> PS: can we remove "ovh centos 7.4" calls from rgw luminous pls? I >> think we did it on master (unless its a must) > > Do you have a link to the master PR/issue so that we can backport? > > > -- > Abhishek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
