Re: killing ceph-rest-api

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sounds a good idea and there is no need for us to maintain the
deployment for ceph-rest-api and its HA anymore.
Regards
Ning Yao


2018-02-03 5:19 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> This has come up several times but it's not dead yet.
>
> I see two options:
>
> 1- Add a mon command passthrough to restful.  John has expressed
> reservations about this in the past as it is too tempting to use.  On the
> other hand, I suspect there will always be a need for things to do
> "low-level" mon commands for unusual cases, and having a way to
> do that without shelling out or creating a librados session seems useful.
>
> 2- Transpant ceph-rest-api into a mgr module.  This probably requires a
> bit more work but would keep it as a separate thing from the curated
> restful.
>
> Thoughts?
> sage
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux