Nice idea. I definitely agree that the submission mechanism needs to support HTTP proxies. I imagine many (most?) ceph-mgr daemons are on private networks, and not everyone has NAT. On 14 December 2017 at 20:24, Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > After discussing with Sage I started to work [0] on a 'brag' module for Ceph > Manager. > > The intention of this module is to send (after a opt-in!) statistics about a > Ceph cluster back to the project every few days. > > My intention is to include: > > - fsid (as identifier) > - number of MONs > - number of OSDs > - FileStore / BlueStore > - number of pools / PGs > - data used in bytes > - data free > - number of objects, > - version(s) > > A admin can also say that the report is allowed to be 'public' where you can > then visit (for example) https://brag.ceph.com/public/<fsid> and show off > your Ceph cluster. > > You could then add a description and we could compile top lists about Ceph > systems. > > How do people think about this? Would this be interesting? > > I would try to convince most of my customers to send this information back > to the project. The more information we get, the better Ceph can become. > > Wido > > [0]: https://github.com/wido/ceph/commits/mgr-brag > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Cheers, ~Blairo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
