Re: LUKS encryption in OSDs (ceph-volume)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, Alfredo Deza wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Wyllys Ingersoll
> <wyllys.ingersoll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Its useful for legacy systems that installed with "plain" back when
> > that was the only option. Since there is no easy migration path for
> > re-keying an encrypted OSD to use a new encryption scheme, keeping
> > support for legacy "plain" is still very useful and desirable.
> 
> Yes, for sure we are going to support that legacy option. But for
> *newly* created OSDs, I was looking forward to follow
> the preferred way with LUKS only.

It's worth mentioning that the "new" way for new ceph-volume OSD 
deployments will also be using LVM, and (presumably?) allow layering 
dm-crypt on top of an LV--not just a PV or raw device.  So this is more a 
question of what, clean slate, we want to do to deploy dm-crypt when the 
end result that we're after is an LV to feed to bluestore or filestore.  
I'm not sure how/where LUKS fits in in the LVM world...

Copying Milan, as I expect he has an opinion here?  :)

sage


> 
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> We have started looking into encryption support in ceph-volume, and
> >> one of the unclear paths is if we really want to support both "plain"
> >> and "LUKS".
> >>
> >> According to the cryptsetup docs [0] :
> >>
> >>     (LUKS) is now the preferred way to set up disk encryption with
> >> dm-crypt using the cryptsetup utility
> >>
> >>
> >> ceph-disk supports both plain and LUKS, but moving forward, I was
> >> interested in understanding if anyone is really expecting the "plain"
> >> type to be a choice?
> >>
> >> The legacy support will mean that ceph-volume will have to deal with
> >> "plain", but moving forward it might be easier if we are supporting a
> >> single type of encryption with LUKS.
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux