On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 3:37 AM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, John Spray wrote: >> I think all the old stable branches got their own merge into the >> ceph.git qa/ directory, so is there anything out there that would >> still want the separate repo at https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite >> ? >> >> If not, it seems like it's been long enough to just go ahead and >> remove this entirely now? The value of keeping it around for >> archaeology is probably less than the cost of it occasionally >> confusing folks. > > +1 I found myself engaged in said archaeology today and remembered about this email. Removing ceph-qa-suite repo would break a lot of links in the tracker, eliminate (however occasional) PR discussions, etc. Does it really cause that much confusion? If "DEPRECATED; see ceph.git/qa" in the title isn't enough, perhaps add it to README as well instead? Thanks, Ilya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
