Thanks for the feedback, Ilya. On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 18:14:04 +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > Yeah, discard_alignment == discard_granularity seems bogus. The name > is misleading too, but that probably comes from SBC, which talks about > OPTIMAL UNMAP GRANULARITY and UNMAP GRANULARITY ALIGNMENT. > > 0 is the default -- let's just drop discard_alignment assignment? Works for me, if you'd prefer. I'll send through a v2 with this. > Also, you quoted <disk>/<partition>/discard_alignment description, but > this is about <disk>/discard_alignment. This had me confused for > a moment. Oops, my bad. Will use the <disk> only description in the next round. Cheers, David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
