On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Josh Durgin <jdurgin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/26/2017 07:26 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > > If this is only for rbd, we might as well store k+m copies since there's > so little omap data. > > I agree cephfs and rgw continue to refuse to use EC for metadata, since > their omap use gets far to large and is in the data path. This highlights, but isn't an answer to the problem. What RGW actually has is a split data path, when data is on EC. Matt -- Matt Benjamin Red Hat, Inc. 315 West Huron Street, Suite 140A Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103 http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/storage tel. 734-821-5101 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
