On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it now supported to be able to write to a secondary zone without problems? > yes from Jewel. > If not supported, is there a timeframe that this (being able to write > to secondary zones) would be supported? > > It also looks like the federated solution does not scale well with > multi region all in sync. > We moved to a new implementation in Jewel (because of problems with the old federated solution). Region is now called zonegroup to avoid confusion with AWS region. A zone in RGW is like an AWS region. > Is there support in Ceph for region-to-region syncing. Based on the > figure in the documentation, it appears that zone to zone syncing does > not happen across a slow wan link (as there are 3 MONs in the backend, > and unified Ceph cluster is not recommended across a WAN) Yes. This is zone to zone sync in RGW. RGW geo replication was designed speciflicly to handle slow WAN link. Each zone is a complete and separates Ceph cluster. For more details see: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/multisite/ http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/Linuxcon_multisitev2.pdf Regards, Orit > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
