Re: Time to drop 11429.yaml from jewel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/18/2017 06:45 AM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
Hi Josh:

rados/singleton-nomsgr/{all/11429.yaml rados.yaml} recently started to fail in the jewel integration branch - here are the two most recent runs:

http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/smithfarm-2017-09-12_17:11:54-rados-wip-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/1623590/teuthology.log

http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/smithfarm-2017-09-13_02:44:35-rados-wip-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/1625890/teuthology.log

Could you help analyze these failures?

Looks like Kefu diagnosed them well on github - race-prone checks in the
test.

I noticed that this test was dropped in the Infernalis development cycle. Is it time to drop it in Jewel as well?

Yes, we certainly don't need any firefly-based tests at this point.

Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux