Re: There is a big risk in function bufferlist::claim_prepend()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:41 PM, 关云飞 <seven.guanyunfei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hello kefu chai,
>
>
> These two days I carefully considered the pr https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17661 and looked the code about bufferlist and I still think the steps of 1-3
> is needed. Although the ptr::_off can guarantee bufferlist to be copied/read/decode/write_file rightly, this will lead a bufferlist not clean and will waste memory
> like picture below.
>
> Of course, it's also possible that i am not thinking about it, do you have any suggestions?

i think it's the user of the bufferlist's choice to defrag the
element(s) in it or not. and it's not a pure win: it hurts the
performance in some cases. in the case of PR#17661, we are trying to
realloc a smaller mem chunk to replace the first memory ptr with it,
if it has "bubbles". what about the second element, or the third one
in the buffer::list, shall we also take care of them as well?

-- 
Regards
Kefu Chai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux