On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Two Spirit wrote: > the two outputs I was referring to was "ceph pg dump" vs "ceph osd > status". These don't match. I'm guessing it is the osd status that > must have the wrong info. Mine seems okay too? (Although it's off by 10%.. not sure about that part... but not by a factor of 1024) $ ceph osd status +----+------+-------+-------+--------+---------+--------+---------+ | id | host | used | avail | wr ops | wr data | rd ops | rd data | +----+------+-------+-------+--------+---------+--------+---------+ | 0 | | 294G | 105G | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +----+------+-------+-------+--------+---------+--------+---------+ sage > > *never* is too strong of a word. When standard interfaces exist eg > JSON/XML that is a luxury. From IT perspective where we use tools from > many vendors, most of the time we don't get that luxury. I use to work > for a well known unix operating system company prior to the invention > of JSON and XML and automated the gui testing. Now that was a pure > waste of time keeping up with the graphical changes, so I've been > scripting against plaintext for a couple decades now. When I need, I > place a "compatibility layer" using regex/wrappers/pipes in between > the tool output and my tool which reformats and normalizes the > plaintext output to an older version of the output. All this was done > through single line lookup table or in the rare case of extreme > changes, a call to a external script filter(still effectively one > line). The test harness automatically cascaded these through pipes > allowing basically any version of the output to be represented. This > allowed all old test tools to keep running with no changes as > developers kept changing the text interface. It is great that Ceph > provide the JSON/XML interfaces tho. Helps a lot. > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Two Spirit wrote: > >> I found "ceph pg dump" also gives the same OSD disk usage information. > >> It has summary row, as well as 3 columns. > >> The bad thing is that the numbers in ceph pg dump and ceph osd status > >> do not match. I'm guessing someone isn't dividing by 1024. > >> I think for consistency the PG stuff should go under ceph pg, and OSD > >> info go under ceph osd. > > > > On my test box it matches (current master): > > > > OSD_STAT USED AVAIL TOTAL HB_PEERS PG_SUM PRIMARY_PG_SUM > > 0 274G 98.4G 372G [] 0 0 > > > > vs > > > > $ df -h . > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > > /dev/nvme0n1 373G 274G 99G 74% /nvm > > > >> As an IT person, I like to to write perl scripts around the outputs, > >> and so persistence of the output format is desired > > > > FWIW you should *never* script against the plaintext output, as it is more > > like to change (for readability or other reasons... e.g., changing a raw > > byte count to something like "98.4G"). Use the structured JSON or XML > > output with -f json[-pretty] or -f xml[-pretty]. > > > > sage > > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > I agree the information is redundant, but when I'm trying to figure > >> > out what is going on, it is very nice to have all info right in front > >> > of my face instead of uber bare bones. Running 'df -kh' shows [Total] > >> > Size, Used, Avail and Use%. That is one step past redundant, but it is > >> > aweful nice to see whatever information I want quickly as well as in a > >> > familiar format and bit of info I think unix it guys are use to. I can > >> > pick the columns of information I need based on what I'm trying to > >> > debug. just my two bits on a feature request. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:01 AM, John Spray <jspray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Two Spirit <twospirit6905@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> Hi. I found this command by accident. it doesn't seem to be undocumented. > >> >>> > >> >>> ceph osd status > >> >>> > >> >>> There is a very similiar command "ceph osd stat" with different info > >> >>> > >> >>> The status command is very useful command and I'd like to see it stay > >> >>> around even tho it seems to be an undocumented command. > >> >>> > >> >>> It would be nice to have a 3rd column "total" which is used+avail > >> >>> columns and then another row at the bottom subtotaling the "used", > >> >>> "avail", and "total" columns. > >> >> > >> >> I prefer to pick two of avail/used/total, rather than printing all > >> >> three -- otherwise the information is a bit redundant. > >> >> > >> >> Putting some totals at the bottom is an interesting idea though. The > >> >> "osd status" and "fs status" commands are implemented in a python > >> >> module[1], so anyone who knows a little python could add that. > >> >> > >> >> John > >> >> > >> >> 1. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/pybind/mgr/status/module.py > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> I know all these could be be calculated, but with more OSDs, it is > >> >>> convenient to have it all available at a glance<div > >> >>> id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br /> > >> >>> <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;"> > >> >>> <tr> > >> >>> <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 13px;"><a > >> >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" > >> >>> target="_blank"><img > >> >>> src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png" > >> >>> alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;" > >> >>> /></a></td> > >> >>> <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 12px; color: #41424e; > >> >>> font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; > >> >>> line-height: 18px;">Virus-free. <a > >> >>> href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" > >> >>> target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;">www.avg.com</a> > >> >>> </td> > >> >>> </tr> > >> >>> </table><a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" > >> >>> height="1"></a></div> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > >> >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >> > >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html