On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:09 PM, kefu chai <tchaikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i noticed that we have a new label named "needs-backport" [0]? could > you shed some light on how we are supposed to use it? i thought we > were going to cherry-pick all PRs with this label merged after the > luminous was forked. but seems we are still marking PRs should be > included by luminous with the "luminous" milestone. so i have no clues > now =( I'm curious too -- I believe the authoriative way to mark something for backport is in a tracker ticket, so a separate label probably isn't needed? John > > cheers, > > --- > [0] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pulls?q=label%3Aneeds-backport > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
