Re: increasingly large packages and longer build times

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 05:30:06PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> On 7-8-2017 16:58, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The ceph-debuginfo package has continued to increase in size on almost
> >> every release, reaching 1.5GB for the latest luminous RC (12.1.2).
> >>
> >> To contrast that, the latest ceph-debuginfo in Hammer was about 0.73GB.
> >>
> >> Having packages that large is problematic on a few fronts:
> > 
> > I agree Alfredo. Here's a similar issue I am experiencing with the source sizes:
> > 
> > Jewel sizes:
> >   14M ceph-10.2.7.tar.gz
> >   82M ceph-10.2.7 uncompressed
> > 
> > Luminous sizes:
> >   142M ceph-12.1.2.tar.gz
> >   709M ceph-12.1.2  uncompressed
> 
> I'm on that same page.
> 

+1 (Proxmox VE, also building downstream packages)

Boost seems to be by far the biggest culprit - we initially built our
packages using the system boost option to save some space, but this
broke one time too often and we are now also shuffling tons of data
around for every version bump.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux