On 06/29/2017 05:18 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Mohamad Gebai wrote: >> Also, preloading libtcmalloc makes this behavior disappear (at least for >> this program), which confirms further the hypothesis, since tcmalloc >> does larger allocations internally. > What do you mean by that last paragraph? We should be linking against > tcmalloc in ceph. But you see that using tcmalloc avoids the problem in > the reproducer? > Yes, that's exactly it. That's why I'm asking about the pattern usage, so I can try to reproduce it in Ceph. I'll try fio as you suggested and follow up. If you have any thoughts in the mean time, please let me know. Mohamad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
