Re: Ceph FileStore optimization with Intel drive and scrubbing optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sage and Mark,

We had another test case (24 hours filestore run with journal stored in Optane drive) done, under our write intensive workloads, we saw IOPS increased by 59%, average latency reduced by 37%, but tail latency (99.99th) went up 65%. This new result is more meaningful for our production consideration.
Do you have any thoughts on why tail latency went up?

Thanks,
Jianjian

On 6/29/17, 9:20 AM, "LIU, Fei" <james.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Hi  All,
      Below link is the slides we presented today in Ceph weekly performance meeting regarding to Ceph Filestore optimization with Intel drive and scrubbing optimization.
    
      https://www.slideshare.net/jupiturliu/ceph-filestore-with-optane-drive-scrub-optimization
    
      Please feel free to let us know if you have any questions.
      
       Regards,
       James 
       Alibaba Storage Team 
    
    


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux