Re: Extra daemons/servers reporting to mgr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just that it could obviate the need to expose and support it as a public librados api.


On 06/12/2017 04:03 PM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
I agree, though I'm unsure how much this matters either way?

Matt

----- Original Message -----

Hi John,

Is there a reason that radosgw can't instantiate its own MgrClient
instance and report status through that, instead of having to go through
librados? If we have to report an entity instance, we could choose from
one of our Rados clients.

Casey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux