Re: another scrub bug? blocked for > 10240.948831 secs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/20/17 20:58, Peter Maloney wrote:
> On 04/20/17 18:19, Sage Weil wrote:
>>  but I guess the 
>> underlying first question is whether any snap deletion happened anywhere 
>> around this period (2560+ sec before the warning, or around the time the 
>> op was sent in epoch 83264).  
> A snapshot based backup thing ran at 12:00 CEST and took until 18:25
> CEST to finish, which overlaps that, and creates and removes 120
> snapshots spread throughout the process.
>> (And yeah, removed_snaps is the field that 
>> matters here!)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> sage
This still happens in 10.2.7

> 2017-04-28 04:41:59.343443 osd.9 10.3.0.132:6808/2704 18 : cluster
> [WRN] slow request 10.040822 seconds old, received at 2017-04-28
> 04:41:49.302552: replica scrub(pg:
> 4.145,from:0'0,to:93267'6832180,epoch:93267,start:4:a2d2c99e:::rbd_data.4bf687238e1f29.000000000000f7a3:0,end:4:a2d2dcd6:::rbd_data.46820b238e1f29.000000000000bfbc:f25e,chunky:1,deep:0,seed:4294967295,version:6)
> currently reached_pg
> ...
> 2017-04-28 06:07:09.975902 osd.9 10.3.0.132:6808/2704 36 : cluster
> [WRN] slow request 5120.673291 seconds old, received at 2017-04-28
> 04:41:49.302552: replica scrub(pg: 4.145,from:0'0,to:93
> 267'6832180,epoch:93267,start:4:a2d2c99e:::rbd_data.4bf687238e1f29.000000000000f7a3:0,end:4:a2d2dcd6:::rbd_data.46820b238e1f29.000000000000bfbc:f25e,chunky:1,deep:0,seed:4294967295,version:
and there are snaps created and removed around that time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux