Re: Jewel regression (not released, but still serious)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Examining the test yaml again, it seems strange that a test called "upgrade:hammer-x/f-h-x-offline" should install firefly and then upgrade directly to "x" (jewel in this case). . .

Opened http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19687 and proposed fix at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/14626 - reviews welcome.

On 04/18/2017 11:03 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
Somehow, something got merged to jewel recently that caused a regression
which showed up in 10.2.8 integration testing. Bisect is ongoing at
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19538#note-30

NOTE: no released versions are affected - not even v10.2.7.

Please refrain from merging anything to jewel until the issue is resolved.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux