Re: rescheduling the performance call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



one or two is better

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Bartłomiej Święcki
<bartlomiej.swiecki@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> #1 best for me,
> #2 also acceptable
> #3 still doable but I'd like to avoid it
>
> BTW, those times are in UTC, I assume this will be adjusted with daylight
> saving time?
>
> Thanks,
> Bartek
>
>
> On 04/06/2017 04:25 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We talked about options for rescheduling the performance call yesterday
>> during the call.  Options include
>>
>> 1. Same time (3pm UTC), but Thursdays
>> 2. One hour earlier (2pm UTC)
>> 3. One hour later (4pm UTC)
>>
>> The preference on the call seemed to be #1: same time, but Thursdays
>> instead of Wednesdays.  The 3pm UTC slot seems to be a sweet spot for
>> Europe and US West Coast folks, and not *too* late for China.
>>
>> Does this work for people?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> sage
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux