Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] libceph: allow requests to return immediately on full conditions if caller wishes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Usually, when the osd map is flagged as full or the pool is at quota,
> write requests just hang. This is not what we want for cephfs, where
> it would be better to simply report -ENOSPC back to userland instead
> of stalling.
>
> If the caller knows that it will want an immediate error return instead
> of blocking on a full or at-quota error condition then allow it to set a
> flag to request that behavior.
>
> Set that flag in ceph_osdc_new_request (since ceph.ko is the only caller),
> and on any other write request from ceph.ko.
>
> A later patch will deal with requests that were submitted before the new
> map showing the full condition came in.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/addr.c                  | 1 +
>  fs/ceph/file.c                  | 1 +
>  include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h | 1 +
>  net/ceph/osd_client.c           | 7 +++++++
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> index 6ecb920602ed..4b9da6ee5c7f 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
> @@ -1889,6 +1889,7 @@ static int __ceph_pool_perm_get(struct ceph_inode_info *ci,
>         err = ceph_osdc_start_request(&fsc->client->osdc, rd_req, false);
>
>         wr_req->r_mtime = ci->vfs_inode.i_mtime;
> +       wr_req->r_abort_on_full = true;
>         err2 = ceph_osdc_start_request(&fsc->client->osdc, wr_req, false);
>
>         if (!err)
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> index 5a7134ef13d3..9dad32d0ed0b 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> @@ -712,6 +712,7 @@ static void ceph_aio_retry_work(struct work_struct *work)
>         req->r_callback = ceph_aio_complete_req;
>         req->r_inode = inode;
>         req->r_priv = aio_req;
> +       req->r_abort_on_full = true;
>
>         ret = ceph_osdc_start_request(req->r_osdc, req, false);
>  out:
> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> index f2ce9cd5ede6..55dcff2455e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/osd_client.h
> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ struct ceph_osd_request {
>         unsigned int            r_num_ops;
>
>         int               r_result;
> +       bool              r_abort_on_full; /* return ENOSPC when full */

Move this under "set by submitter", after r_linger?

>
>         struct ceph_osd_client *r_osdc;
>         struct kref       r_kref;
> diff --git a/net/ceph/osd_client.c b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> index 5c0938ddddf6..8fc0ccc7126f 100644
> --- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> +++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static void link_linger(struct ceph_osd *osd,
>                         struct ceph_osd_linger_request *lreq);
>  static void unlink_linger(struct ceph_osd *osd,
>                           struct ceph_osd_linger_request *lreq);
> +static void complete_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req, int err);

Move this closer to __submit_request(), before send_map_check() forward
declaration?

>
>  #if 1
>  static inline bool rwsem_is_wrlocked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
> @@ -961,6 +962,7 @@ struct ceph_osd_request *ceph_osdc_new_request(struct ceph_osd_client *osdc,
>                                        truncate_size, truncate_seq);
>         }
>
> +       req->r_abort_on_full = true;
>         req->r_flags = flags;
>         req->r_base_oloc.pool = layout->pool_id;
>         req->r_base_oloc.pool_ns = ceph_try_get_string(layout->pool_ns);
> @@ -1635,6 +1637,7 @@ static void __submit_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req, bool wrlocked)
>         enum calc_target_result ct_res;
>         bool need_send = false;

bool need_abort here instead of ret?  This is a filesystem specific
hack, so it's always going to be ENOSPC.

>         bool promoted = false;
> +       int ret = 0;
>
>         WARN_ON(req->r_tid);
>         dout("%s req %p wrlocked %d\n", __func__, req, wrlocked);
> @@ -1669,6 +1672,8 @@ static void __submit_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req, bool wrlocked)
>                 pr_warn_ratelimited("FULL or reached pool quota\n");
>                 req->r_t.paused = true;
>                 maybe_request_map(osdc);
> +               if (req->r_abort_on_full)
> +                       ret = -ENOSPC;
>         } else if (!osd_homeless(osd)) {
>                 need_send = true;
>         } else {
> @@ -1685,6 +1690,8 @@ static void __submit_request(struct ceph_osd_request *req, bool wrlocked)
>         link_request(osd, req);
>         if (need_send)
>                 send_request(req);
> +       else if (ret)
> +               complete_request(req, ret);

I think this is the first complete_request() on the submit thread, so
I'm a little worried about possible deadlocks and/or other weirdness.
Did you look through all start/handle_reply sites in the filesystem?

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux