On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-92 > > The following suites were in scope of this point release validation: > > rados (subset 35/50 228 jobs) > rbd > rgw > fs > krbd > kcephfs > knfs > rest > hadoop > samba > ceph-deploy > ceph-disk > upgrade/client-upgrade > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) > upgrade/jewel-x/point-to-point-x > powercycle > > (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list) > > ============================== > (overall pretty clean validation cycle, kudos to @Nathan and the > backporting team !) > > Issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089 resulted in several > failures, but is infrastructure related. > > Issues requiring approval/decision: > > rados - one job failed, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089, need Josh approval > > krbd - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17221, need Ilya's approval/fix > > samba- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19101, need John's approval/fix > > upgrade/client-upgrade - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19080, need > Jason, Nathan approval/and or backport > > upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18089, can > be approved for release, Sage? If you mean it's just hte xenial nodes failing on the package install, yeah, ignore those failures! sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
