>> On my centos7 box they are not defined when I installed the ceph package? It was this statement that concerned me. Wondering why the ceph user/group wasn't created during your CentOS install? On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20-2-2017 07:07, Brad Hubbard wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a typical uid/gid that is selected on oterh platforms to assign >>> to ceph:ceph? >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/ceph.spec.in#L970 >> >> I wonder if that should be "%if 0%{?rhel} || 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?centos}" ? >> >> Seems odd you'd be the first to notice though????? >> >>> >>> On my centos7 box they are not defined when I installed the ceph package? > > This is/was for my FreeBSD ceph port.... > And it seems that there is a bit of consensus on 167 IF IDs need to be < > 1000. Which is the case for preassigned UID/GIDs on FreeBSD. > > So for now I took 167:167, which was still free. > > Thanx, > --WjW > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Cheers, Brad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
