Hi,
I’m curious are there specific advantages to compiling Ceph with clang vs. gcc? I understand that clang uses less memory, compiles faster, and has better errors/diagnostics, but as it relates to Ceph is there any specific advantages?
Is there a plan to switching to clang?
Thanks!
Bassam
> On Feb 9, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this is a recent addition to the game?
> And Clang does not really like it.
>
> In file included from
> /home/jenkins/workspace/ceph-master/src/common/perf_counters.h:21:
> /home/jenkins/workspace/ceph-master/src/common/perf_histogram.h:80:9:
> error: array initializer must be an initializer list
> : m_axes_config(other.m_axes_config) {
> ^
> /home/jenkins/workspace/ceph-master/src/common/perf_counters.h:98:29:
> note: in instantiation of member function
> 'PerfHistogram<2>::PerfHistogram' requested here
> histogram.reset(new PerfHistogram<>(*other.histogram));
> ^
> 1 error generated.
>
> --WjW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__vger.kernel.org_majordomo-2Dinfo.html&d=DwICaQ&c=8S5idjlO_n28Ko3lg6lskTMwneSC-WqZ5EBTEEvDlkg&r=BTMd2ANcDl5P_nTkEam5zzywWdGjHoaoXy4JMG_yHPA&m=PzCl2U7BH52mycDw3PiC7LaCbGCCTewMNBUqu8gGKIQ&s=gR4xXKHg4AFcwEccrIs-KoM7bjGw0aL9CnVF_PQE_fo&e=
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
