Re: question about backfill on erasure pool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, huang jun wrote:
> hi,all
> i have a question about pg backfill on erasure pool.
> pg0 in erasure pool, which k:m=2:1,
> at first, pg0 on osd [1,2,3], after osd.4 added,
> the pg0 is now distribute to osd [1,2,4],
> for replicated pool, it will do backfill from primary(osd.1) to osd.4,
> for erasure code pool, the primary osd.1 needs to read the data chunks
> from osd.1 and osd.2,
> then decode and push the parity chunk to osd.4,
> in the above case, the osd.3 is up and contain the parity chunk,
> why dont let osd.3 push the parity chunk to osd.4?

I don't think there is any reason why we couldn't... it just hasn't been 
implemented.  Sam?

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux